Photosynthesis and Shoot Health of Five Birch and Four Alder Taxa After Drought and Flooding
Selection of under-used taxa of birches (Betula L.) and alders (Alnus Miller) for use in managed landscapes can be guided by information on their responses to moisture extremes in the root zone. Our objective was to compare the photosynthesis, leaf surface area, and subjective health ratings of eight relatively obscure birches and alders when treated with drought and flooding in a greenhouse. We also treated ‘Whitespire Sr.’ birch (Betula populifolia) to demonstrate responses of a cultivar common in the nursery trade. Plants used as controls were irrigated daily, whereas pots of flooded plants were immersed. All water was withheld from the drought-treated taxon that showed the least evapotranspiration each day, while amounts of water less than that lost to evapotranspiration each day were added to plants of the other taxa subjected to drought. After three cycles of drought that induced wilting and a reduction in photosynthetic rate, leaf surface area of A. hirsuta had decreased the least, 12%, among the alders. While drought reduced the photosynthesis of all birches during the study, mean photosynthetic rate of drought-treated B. uber was higher than that of B. albosinensis and B. davurica subjected to drought. Flooding for 7 days did not influence photosynthetic rate of any alder but reduced photosynthesis of all the birches except B. davurica. After 21 days of flooding, only plants of B. albosinensis and B. costata were killed, and A. maritima was the only alder that fully sustained photosynthesis. While our data support the idea that most alders and birches are adapted to wet and well-drained sites, respectively, responses to drought varied among the four alders, and the four uncommon birches we grew responded differently to flooding. Specifically, additional evaluations under field conditions should be done to confirm the resilience of A. hirsuta and A. maritima to recurrent drought and to verify whether the comparatively promising (B. davurica and B. uber) and poor (B. albosinensis and B. costata) flood resistance we observed among the birches is meaningful in the landscape.Abstract
Contributor Notes
Supported in part by The Horticultural Research Institute, 1000 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005. The USDA-Agricultural Research Service, National Program Staff, also provided funding. J.A. Schrader collected seeds of A. maritima, J.K. Iles provided health ratings, and M.S. Dosmann measured leaf area. Journal Paper No. J-19554 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station, Ames, IA, Projects No. 3603 and 1018, and supported by Hatch Act and State of Iowa funds. Mention of commercial brand-name products does not constitute an endorsement of any products by the USDA-ARS or cooperating agencies.
2Professor, Department of Horticulture.
3Assistant Scientist II, Department of Horticulture.
4Horticulturist, USDA-Agricultural Research Service.